Rickenbacker International Corporation - Forum
http://www.rickenbacker.com/forum/

Is a New 350 Body 'Internally-Chambered" ?
http://www.rickenbacker.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=16174
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Docmarino [ Fri Mar 11, 2016 11:15 am ]
Post subject:  Is a New 350 Body 'Internally-Chambered" ?

I have an early Rose-Morris 325.... It's obviously semi-hollow....F-Hole design. BUT, what about a newer 325 or 350 with no F-Hole? Are they the same internally chambered body, with no hole?.........I don't have any 350's anywhere near my location to compare.

Does ANYONE have a definitive answer ??? :?: :? :?:

Author:  JohnHall [ Fri Mar 11, 2016 11:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is a New 350 Body 'Internally-Chambered" ?

All of the "no-hole" models are built exactly the same as those with -F- holes, i.e. chambered. The hole just isn't cut out.

Author:  Docmarino [ Fri Mar 11, 2016 3:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is a New 350 Body 'Internally-Chambered" ?

Excellent......... Thanks for the fast response !

Author:  LowSurf [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is a New 350 Body 'Internally-Chambered" ?

And I was just explaining/debating this to a friend who refused to believe my 350 had chambers, despite the "knock test." I wonder if he'll be convinced by the president of the company....

Thanks, John Hall!

Author:  LowSurf [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is a New 350 Body 'Internally-Chambered" ?

And I was just explaining/debating this to a friend who refused to believe my 350 had chambers, despite the "knock test." I wonder if he'll be convinced by the president of the company....

Thanks, John Hall!

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/