| Author |
Message |
|
spikestar
|
Post subject: POD 2.0 QUESTION  Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:44 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 1
|
|
Can some one plz tell me how i can get a santana sound on a pod although i know hi desnt use a pod. or any other similar sound.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Free_Faller
|
Post subject: Re: POD 2.0 QUESTION Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 5:49 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:03 am
Posts: 83
|
|
I can't give you the setings (I don't have them) but if you go to the Line 6 web site, there is a POD page with tons of user guitar sounds, searchable by name. You can download any of them via USB to your POD.
I couldn't find a McGuinn sound there, does anyone have POD settings for the Byrds jangle?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
LoveRickBass
|
Post subject: Re: POD 2.0 QUESTION Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 5:58 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:00 pm
Posts: 103
Location: North Carolina USA
|
|
For McGuinn, I use Brit Blues with 100% compression. I also use a little delay too. I put drive on about 2.
Cole
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JohnHall
|
Post subject: Re: POD 2.0 QUESTION Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:25 pm |
|
 |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:00 pm
Posts: 4038
Location: Santa Ana, CA
|
|
I just e-mailed Roger and this was his answer:
"I did use a POD for a while but was having problems with it losing its settings between sound check and the concert. It's a bit tricky to get the "Byrds Sound" with it but here's what I set it for:
Brit Blues, Delay/Compression, 2X12 speakers, Output level: 5, Drive: 0,
Bass: 8, Middle: 3, Treble: 5, Chan Vol: 10, Reverb: 2.5, Effect Tweak: 6.25.
Just mess around with it close to those settings and see if you can get it sounding they way you like."
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TomTrig
|
Post subject: Re: POD 2.0 QUESTION Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:45 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 1:00 pm
Posts: 345
Location: Philadelphia
|
|
I like the POD for home use, with my headphones.
The Rock Band Weezer did their entire tour using just PODS direct to the PA.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
LoveRickBass
|
Post subject: Re: POD 2.0 QUESTION Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:10 am |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:00 pm
Posts: 103
Location: North Carolina USA
|
|
Best musicial gear since Rickenbacker! I wish they could make the package more retro looking though. More like the Vox version.
Cole
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Free_Faller
|
Post subject: Re: POD 2.0 QUESTION Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:11 am |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:03 am
Posts: 83
|
|
Thanks everyone and especially Mr. Hall. Now, if you will just forward Roger's email addy to me...YEAH, RIGHT!! :)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JohnHall
|
Post subject: Re: POD 2.0 QUESTION Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:15 am |
|
|
| Site Admin |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:00 pm
Posts: 4038
Location: Santa Ana, CA
|
|
| |
|
|
|
LoveRickBass
|
Post subject: Re: POD 2.0 QUESTION Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:59 am |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:00 pm
Posts: 103
Location: North Carolina USA
|
|
Good luck with emailing him. I've never had any luck in contacting him. Now he has some automated email reply whenever you send mail to him. :(
Cole
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FirstBassman
|
Post subject: Re: POD 2.0 QUESTION Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 2:40 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:00 pm
Posts: 410
Location: Virginia, USA
|
Quote: "I did use a POD for a while but was having problems with it losing its settings between sound check and the concert. Of course, that begs the question - what is he using instead? . . . the black and yellow boxed JB? As far as Roger's e-mail address, he does have another personal address (at least one other I suppose) other than the one listed on that web site. I, certainly, would not send it out without his permission. He and Camilla have been very gracious to me and I try to never abuse the 'artist e-mail privilege.' Then again, having just said that, it's possible the address I have will bounce back too now. Regards, - Mark
|
|
| |
|
|
|
